History: HHO gas

23 October 2012

• curprev 10:2610:26, 23 October 2012‎ 82.243.178.56 contribs‎ 14,330 bytes +9‎ →‎References
• curprev 10:2510:25, 23 October 2012‎ 82.243.178.56 contribs‎ 14,321 bytes +163‎ →‎References

18 April 2010

• curprev 22:4222:42, 18 April 2010‎ A Nobody talk contribs‎ 14,158 bytes +14,100‎ cut template
• curprev 22:3622:36, 18 April 2010‎ A Nobody talk contribs‎ m 58 bytes 0‎ 71 revisions

6 May 2008

• curprev 19:0519:05, 6 May 2008‎ Happy-melon talk contribs‎ 58 bytes −8‎ rm section target

12 August 2007

• curprev 16:2116:21, 12 August 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 66 bytes +8‎ direct link

26 June 2007

• curprev 15:0015:00, 26 June 2007‎ Tizio talk contribs‎ m 58 bytes +33‎ cat

20 June 2007

• curprev 16:1016:10, 20 June 2007‎ Im>Xoloz‎ m 25 bytes 0‎ Protected HHO gas: protected redirect per DRV (if NEW material merits undoing redirect, please an admin, or request unprotection as usual) [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
• curprev 16:0216:02, 20 June 2007‎ Im>Xoloz‎ 25 bytes −15,910‎ redirect per DRV

10 June 2007

• curprev 23:2323:23, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,935 bytes 0‎ →‎News coverage: format refs
• curprev 23:2223:22, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,935 bytes +38‎ →‎News coverage: restore text - see talk for why it was removed
• curprev 23:0323:03, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,897 bytes +50‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:5822:58, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,847 bytes +135‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:5622:56, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,712 bytes +75‎ move santilli intro back to intro where it belongs
• curprev 22:5322:53, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,637 bytes −50‎ more strange text
• curprev 22:5222:52, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,687 bytes +491‎ Undid revision 137333611 by Tbeatty (talk)
• curprev 22:4722:47, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,196 bytes +493‎ →‎Properties: debunk sublimation of tungsten - so if they're getting their claim of "over 10,000 °F" from tungsten's boiling point of 10,031 °F, that's debunked, too.
• curprev 22:3422:34, 10 June 2007‎ Im>DHeyward‎ 14,703 bytes −470‎ Patent doesn't support this. blogs are not reliable.
• curprev 21:5921:59, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,173 bytes +12‎ →‎Properties
• curprev 21:5821:58, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,161 bytes −33‎ remove totallydisputed - still nothing brought up on the talk page, use normal TOC
• curprev 21:5721:57, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,194 bytes −34‎ →‎Properties: fix more bad formatting and grammar
• curprev 21:4721:47, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,228 bytes −6‎ formatting
• curprev 21:4521:45, 10 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,234 bytes +226‎ add cite
• curprev 16:1916:19, 10 June 2007‎ Im>JCLately‎ m 15,008 bytes +1‎ supply missing comma
• curprev 01:2401:24, 10 June 2007‎ Im>DHeyward‎ 15,007 bytes −24‎ PAtent claims no such thing. Patent is a claim for a more efficient eletrolyzer that enhances fuel economy in normal cars. The claims are for a mechanical part, not the gas.

9 June 2007

• curprev 17:2517:25, 9 June 2007‎ SmackBot talk contribs‎ m 15,031 bytes +15‎ Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes
• curprev 16:1216:12, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,016 bytes −512‎ →‎News coverage: rm donations, not news reports
• curprev 16:1016:10, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,528 bytes −9‎ →‎Properties: delinking
• curprev 16:0816:08, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,537 bytes −8‎ less offensive to proponent of this scam
• curprev 16:0716:07, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,545 bytes +796‎ ref+tag
• curprev 16:0416:04, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 14,749 bytes +284‎ ref
• curprev 16:0016:00, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 14,465 bytes +12‎ attribute Santilli
• curprev 15:4815:48, 9 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 14,453 bytes +9‎ sethie thinks we need to provide someone offering "suggestions to the contrary" or remove this phrase from this sentence
• curprev 15:4615:46, 9 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 14,444 bytes 0‎ move to section below... in the intro without a context, this is just a random statement.
• curprev 09:1909:19, 9 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 14,444 bytes +3‎ patent

8 June 2007

• curprev 23:5923:59, 8 June 2007‎ John talk contribs‎ 14,441 bytes −839‎ copyedit. Dimers means something else altogether. lose youtube
• curprev 23:5623:56, 8 June 2007‎ 84.87.61.22 contribs‎ 15,280 bytes −17‎ observing science ignores this fantasy is not weaseling
• curprev 19:3019:30, 8 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ 15,297 bytes −5‎ →‎News coverage: rm weasel
• curprev 19:2919:29, 8 June 2007‎ Nescio talk contribs‎ m 15,302 bytes +15‎ →‎Water-fuelled car: promotion
• curprev 16:1516:15, 8 June 2007‎ Sethie talk contribs‎ 15,287 bytes −43‎ →‎News coverage: all of these are television programs, not a single a " popular science newspaper articles" is listed here, much less "many"
• curprev 12:5012:50, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,330 bytes −25‎ →‎Water-fuelled car: "covering its promotion"?? this very paragraph includes criticism in those same programs. why do you keep adding this? what are your motives?
• curprev 12:4612:46, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,355 bytes +80‎ →‎Water-fuelled car
• curprev 12:4512:45, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 15,275 bytes +2,029‎ restore section about water-fuelled car. this is the crux of the hoax aspect. If you still think it's OR, bring it up on the talk page.
• curprev 12:4112:41, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,246 bytes −1‎ →‎News coverage: "that did not comment on its veracity"? what does that even mean?
• curprev 12:4012:40, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,247 bytes +17‎ →‎Criticism: and this is more weasel-worded, unsourced nonsense
• curprev 12:4012:40, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,230 bytes +23‎ →‎Criticism: criticism sections are stupid. the entire article should be critical.
• curprev 12:3912:39, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ m 13,207 bytes −5‎ →‎Properties
• curprev 12:3912:39, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,212 bytes +1‎ special claims are made in santilli's journal article, scientific response would also be in journals
• curprev 12:3712:37, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,211 bytes +17‎ you can't prove a negative, and we already say that it's a hoax by association
• curprev 12:3612:36, 8 June 2007‎ Omegatron talk contribs‎ 13,194 bytes −46‎ there is no dispute that this is a gas, that it can be created, or that it can be used to weld. what is disputed are the claimed special properties. no need to mention patent in intro. rm "ordinary"